🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 375+ reviews
Outdoorβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(375 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$14
$23.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage PITCHER Royal blue in flawless condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher

Vintage PITCHER Royal blue in impeccable condition

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1470596

Category: Outdoor > Watering Equipment > Watering Cans

Original Price:$23.33 USD

Sale Price:$14 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6161 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest purchase ever
I’ve had a smooth experience using the Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher.
44 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis
5 months ago Β· Aurora, CO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really satisfied
It’s an okay product overall, the Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher.
17 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fabulous value for money
Pretty happy with the Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher.
14 people found this helpful​
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly suggest!
To be fair, the Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher performs as expected and it’s fine overall.
20 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase 
9 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
magnificent Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher!
In daily use, the Vintage fiesta WARE small pitcher performs as expected so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.
11 people found this helpful